The Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies invites you to join Gen Stephen Wilson, Vice Chief of Staff, United States Air Force, for a discussion on the Nuclear Posture Review, national security strategy, and nuclear deterrence.
Deterrence
38 entries | Page 4 of 4
Event
Nuclear Arms Control and Deterrent Futures: An Assessment
The Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies invites you to join Madelyn Creedon, President of Green Marble LLC, and Lt Gen Frank Klotz, USAF (Ret), Former Under Secretary of Energy for Nuclear Security, for a discussion on nuclear arms control and deterrent futures.
Event
The North Korea Sanctions Regime a Year After Singapore
Join USIP for a discussion that will examine the scope and purposes of the North Korea sanctions regime, consider the constraints and opportunities for providing partial and complete sanctions relief, and provide a comparative look at other such regimes.
Event
Peering Beyond the DMZ: Understanding North Korea behind the Headlines
Join @CatoInstitute as they delve into issues beyond the headline on North Korea.
analysis
Continuity Is Not Consensus: The Future Nuclear Posture Review
The 2018 Nuclear Posture Review, preceded by wide debate, is enjoying a honeymoon of sorts. Domestically, it received strong support and close to full funding while internationally, it has received strong support from allies. However, controversy over the NPR may be just around the corner. There needs to be strong bipartisan commitment to nuclear infrastructure and delivery system modernization as well as arms control.
report
Project on Nuclear Issues Annual Journal – 2017
A Collection of Papers from the 2017 Nuclear Scholars Initiative and PONI Conference Series
report
Project on Nuclear Issues
A Collection of Papers from the 2016 Nuclear Scholars Initiative and PONI Conference Series
report
An Evolving Narrative: A Report on the Role and Value of U.S. Nuclear Weapons, 1989-Today
This study aims to create a dialogue with the nation’s nuclear personnel about the rationales for the U.S. nuclear arsenal that already exist—some of which have been stated at the highest levels of leadership—to ask what the nuclear forces actually hear, what works and what does not, and what motivates them on a daily basis.