The hypersonic missile debate is a difficult one to navigate. This event showcases prominent thought leaders in the U.S. policy discourse surrounding hypersonic missiles and will feature a recent paper from the Center for Space Policy & Strategy that attempts to map out the debate. A central argument from the paper is that experts’ views on hypersonic weapons are inextricably linked with their preferred strategic aims, military objectives, vis-à-vis Russia and China. A point that panelists will grapple with is whether experts’ technological views or strategic preferences are driving the debate. Tuesday, February 9, 2021, 12:30 PM – 4:00 PM EST Discussion of The Hypersonic Missile Debate Paper Sam Wilson, CSPS Policy Analyst, The Aerospace Corportion Speaker: Thomas Mahnken, Center for Strategic Budgetary Assessments Panel 1: Divergent Strategic Aims, Divergent Technological Views Moderator: Russell Rumbaugh, Systems Director, The Aerospace Corporation Panelists: Rebeccah Heinrichs, Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute Jeffrey Lewis, Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey Panel 2: Unentangling the Strategic & Technological Moderator: Robin Dickey, CSPS Policy Analyst, The Aerospace Corporation Panelists: Jill Hruby, Former Director of Sandia National Laboratories Dean Wilkening, Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Lab Cameron Tracy, Union for Concerned Scientists