1115 entries | Page 6 of 112

FeaturedanalysisNext Gen Perspectives

The papers included in this volume comprise research from participants in the 2020 Nuclear Scholars Initiative and the PONI Conference Series. These papers explore such topics as the impacts of emerging technologies and capabilities, deep-diving on nuclear strategy and national policies, proposing paths forward for addressing proliferation challenges, and enhancing arms control in contentious environments.

Nuclear Policy News

Nuclear Policy News – February 16, 2021

Top News:

Iran’s uranium metal production is ‘most serious nuclear step’ to date, but deal can still be saved
CNBC

China may exercise ‘nuclear option’ against US defense industry with rare-earths export ban – reports
RT

ANALYSIS: What does the history tell us about Iran’s nuclear intentions?
CSIS PONI

Read More

Nuclear Scholars: Class of 2021

These 33 Scholars represent organizations in the government, military, national labs, nonprofits, private sector, and academia. More about the Nuclear Scholars Initiative » Akshai Vikram Akshai Vikram is a former Roger L. Hale Fellow at Ploughshares Fund, where he worked on nuclear nonproliferation and arms control issues, publishing a report on the new U.S.-Russia arms Read More

Deep Dive Debrief Series

The CSIS Project on Nuclear Issues (PONI) Deep Dive Debrief series explores emerging or contentious nuclear challenges. These briefs are based on a series of “deep dive” workshops convened by PONI that bring together next generation technical, operational, and policy experts from across the nuclear community to debate and discuss these nuclear challenges.  Strategic Stability Read More

FeaturedEvent

The Hypersonic Missile Debate

Location: Virtual Event
Dates: - February 9, 2021

The hypersonic missile debate is a difficult one to navigate. This event showcases prominent thought leaders in the U.S. policy discourse surrounding hypersonic missiles and will feature a recent paper from the Center for Space Policy & Strategy that attempts to map out the debate. A central argument from the paper is that experts’ views Read More